Barry Posen argues that containing and deterring the threat of a nuclear Iran is preferrable to the consquences that would result from military action to prevent it.
China is building up its nuclear forces as part of a secret strategy targeting the United States, according to a former Chinese diplomat.
Russia is relying more and more on its strategic nuclear arsenal as its conventional strength continues to deteriorate.
The current negotiations with Iran over their possible nuclear weapons program show that a country can gain just as much credibility by demonstrating the capacity to develop a nuclear weapons program (a "virtual bomb") as if they were to actually test one.
The author argues that for the U.S. nuclear arsenal to remain an effective deterrent, our nuclear weapons "must have greatly increased accuracy, reduced yields, specialized capabilities (such as deep earth penetration) and tailored effects (such as ability to neutralize chemical-biological agents)."
Israel continues to produce atomic weapons and already has hundreds of nuclear warheads, researchers said as the country released a man imprisoned for 18 years for leaking nuclear secrets.
The United States and Russia unnecessarily continue to maintain thousands of strategic nuclear missiles on high alert for mutual deterrence, heightening the possibility of a catastrophic, unintended launch, according to Bruce Blair, president of the Center for Defense Information.
Five years after first publicly testing nuclear weapons, India stands at a critical point in its strategic path. It faces today a crucial choice between maintaining a minimal deterrent and expanding its arsenal so as to sustain a Cold War-style posture toward its nuclear adversaries.
Dr. Keith Payne defends U.S. plans to develop low-yield and "bunker-buster" nuclear weapons. He argues that the critics claims have been empirically denied and that the new weapons are needed to ensure deterrence.
Adobe Acrobat PDF File
The author argues the U.S. case for developing earth-penetrating nuclear weapons is flawed on technical, practical, and political grounds.