The United States is headed for a showdown with Russia and China this week over competing international treaties, one banning the production of nuclear materials and the other trying to prevent an arms race in space.
The authors propose the establishment of an International Nuclear Fuel Bank, controlled by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Countries would be able to draw fuel for their power plants, provided they agree to strict verification and inspections, and then return the spent fuel for safe oversight by the agency.
Eric Hundman surveys the history of the Global Threat Reduction Initiative and finds that while progress has been slower than expected, the program has "has focused attention worldwide on nuclear security and conversion programs."
Four years after the leaders of the world's eight largest economies vowed to raise $20 billion over 10 years to prevent terrorists from obtaining nuclear materials, only $3.5 billion has been donated -- and far less has been used to secure enriched uranium, the key ingredient of a nuclear weapon.
The Bush administration's plan to deploy a high-tech fuel to power a new generation of nuclear reactors worldwide has a potentially explosive problem: It is too easy for terrorists to grab and turn it into a nuclear bomb.
The author notes that the existing norm against nuclear proliferation, enshrined in the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, is fast eroding. He argues that a better alternative would be to negotiate a new agreement that would establish an international agency to control the production and distribution of fissile material for peaceful nuclear purposes.
The Bush administration is preparing a plan to expand civilian nuclear energy at home and abroad while taking spent fuel from foreign countries and reprocessing it, in a break with decades of U.S. policy, according to U.S. and foreign officials briefed on the initiative.
The U.S. Department of Energy is trying to tackle the old problem of what to do with nuclear waste by revisiting an old solution: reprocessing. Critics are concerned that reprocessing will increase the supply of bomb-grade fissile material.
A new report from the Pugwash Institute argues for greater emphasis on the elimination of highly enriched uranium (HEU) as "the most economically attractive and effective method to deal with the threat of nuclear terrorism."
Enough Russian nuclear material is currently unaccounted for that ?those with know-how? could construct a nuclear weapon if they were to obtain it, according to recent testimony from CIA Director Porter Goss.