search  
Animal Machine Interface
Artificial Life
Asteroid Defense
Biological Warfare
Cloning
Cryptography
Energy
Genetic Engineering
Information Warfare
MEMs
Metacomputing
Missile Defense
Nanotechnology
Neurotechnology
Nuclear Proliferation
Physics
Satellites
SETI
Space Expansion
Space Warfare
Surveillance Technology
Virtual Reality



Subscribe with Bloglines

Science Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory



SUBSCRIBE
for updates

   NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION : NO FIRST-USE POLICY
News Resources Bibliography
China and "No First Use" -- Jeffrey Lewis  -- ArmsControlWonk.com  -- July 17, 2005

Jeffrey Lewis defuses the recent "threat" by Chinese General Zhu Chenghu to attack the U.S. with nuclear weapons if the U.S. interferes in Taiwan by examining its relevance given China's long-standing committment to "No First-Use."

Explore Related:


New Bush WMD Strategy Marks a Significant Departure, Experts Say -- Bryan Bender  -- Global Security Newswire  -- December 13, 2002

The new U.S. strategy for combating weapons of mass destruction marks a significant departure from long-standing U.S. policy by publicly advocating a nuclear response in the face of a chemical or biological attack, according to government officials and private analysts.

Explore Related:


U.S. Sees Nuclear Deterrence Against WMD Attack -- Randall Mikkelsen  -- Reuters  -- December 10, 2002

The United States recently reminded Iraq and other countries that it was prepared to use nuclear weapons if necessary to respond to an attack from weapons of mass destruction.

Explore Related:


The US and No First Use: Preemption Trumps Deterrence? -- Jeffrey Boutwell  -- Pugwash Conference  -- November 17, 2002

The author tracks the evolution of U.S. nuclear policy to the current policy of preemption of WMD threats and concludes that U.S. adoption of a "No First Use" policy is highly unlikely for the forseeable future.

Explore Related:


Critics say Bush doctrine might provoke 1st strike -- Storer H. Rowley  -- Chicago Tribune  -- June 24, 2002

President Bush's emerging doctrine advocating pre-emptive military strikes against America's adversaries or terrorists possessing weapons of mass destruction could lead to unintended, and in some cases disastrous, consequences, defense analysts warn.

Explore Related:


Bush Developing Military Policy Of Striking First -- Thomas E. Ricks and Vernon Loeb  -- Washington Post  -- June 09, 2002

The Bush administration is developing a new strategic doctrine that moves away from the Cold War pillars of containment and deterrence toward a policy that supports preemptive attacks against terrorists and hostile states with chemical, biological or nuclear weapons.

Explore Related:


Nuclear Arms for Deterrence or Fighting? -- Michael R. Gordon  -- New York Times  -- March 11, 2002

The Pentagon's new blueprint on nuclear forces has raised the question whether the Bush administration is lowering the threshold for using nuclear arms.

Explore Related:


New US Proposals Could Quash Nuclear Taboos -- Jean-Michel Stoullig  -- Spacedaily  -- March 11, 2002

Defense experts suggest that the new U.S. nuclear doctrine blurs the line between conventional and nuclear weapons by raising the issue of their adaption for use in combat rather than in deterrence as was the case during the Cold War.

Explore Related:


Pentagon Policy Could Lower Nuclear Threshold -- Staff  -- Global Security Newswire  -- March 11, 2002

Recently leaked information about U.S. nuclear weapons policies indicates the Pentagon might reduce the threshold for using nuclear weapons, according to some analysts.

Explore Related:


Bush Policy May Allow Broader Nuclear Use, Analysts Say -- David Ruppe  -- Global Security Newswire  -- February 27, 2002

The U.S. military may be providing President George W. Bush a broader range of options for using nuclear weapons in contingencies around the world, analysts say, even as the Bush administration last week said it is sticking by a long-standing U.S. pledge to not use nuclear weapons on non-nuclear states.

Explore Related: