Gregory Kulacki exposes the misperceptions and mistranslations in U.S. intelligence assessments of China's military and space efforts.
The authors summarize the current debate over how to dispose of weapons-grade plutonium and show the flaws in the two current strategies. They then introduce an alternative 'third way', fabricating the plutonium into rods of "storage MOX" that could be then buried geologically.
The author criticizes the International Space Station for being a flawed space science project but praises it for its political merits especially as an incentive for non-proliferation.
Jonathan Tucker and Amy Sands argue that the current hysteria surrounding the threat of chemical or biological terrorism is unwarranted.
The authors argue that nuclear weapons "leave a lot to be desired compared to the growing U.S. arsenal of unmatched, super-fast, super-accurate new weapons."