search  
Animal Machine Interface
Artificial Life
Asteroid Defense
Biological Warfare
Cloning
Cryptography
Energy
Genetic Engineering
Information Warfare
MEMs
Metacomputing
Missile Defense
Nanotechnology
Neurotechnology
Nuclear Proliferation
Physics
Satellites
SETI
Space Expansion
Space Warfare
Surveillance Technology
Virtual Reality



Subscribe with Bloglines

Science Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory



SUBSCRIBE
for updates

   BROWSE BY SOURCE : BULLETIN OF THE ATOMIC SCIENTISTS
Taming Antisatellite and Space Weapons -- Richard L. Garwin  -- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists  -- May 30, 2007

Richard Garwin suggests a compromise space weapons treaty that would prohibit new anti-satellite weapon tests, but still allow for temporary and reversible attacks (ex. jamming, concealment, interference with the line of sight, etc) on non-strategic space assets.

Explore Related:


Rethinking Doomsday -- Linda Rothstein, Catherine Auer and Jonas Siegel  -- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists  -- November 01, 2004

The authors evaluate the risks from several popular doomsday scenarios including smallpox biological terrorism, grey goo, and nuclear terrorism.

Explore Related:


Reining In The Space Cowboys -- James Clay Moltz  -- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists  -- January 01, 2003

James Clay Moltz looks at the debate over space weapons and offers several moderate proposals for achieving progress in space arms control.

Explore Related:


Back to Bioweapons? -- Mark Wheelis & Malcolm Dando  -- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists  -- January 01, 2003

The authors accuse the U.S. of rejecting a recent bioweapons protocol because it is committed to continuing and expanding its secret bioweapons research programs.

Explore Related:


Pelted by paint, downed by debris -- Joel Primack  -- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists  -- October 01, 2002

Joel Primack cautions that testing space weapons could exacerbate the space debris problem and a space war could "encase the entire planet in a shell of whizzing debris that would thereafter make space near the Earth highly hazardous for peaceful as well as military purposes."

Explore Related:


Would They If They Could? -- Gary Ackerman & Laura Snyder  -- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists  -- May 01, 2002

The authors analyze the potential for nuclear terrorism in the current Israeli-Palestinian conflict and conclude "that an escalation to WMD is a credible concern that cannot be dismissed out of hand."

Explore Related:


Keeping track of anthrax: The case for a biosecurity convention -- Michael Barletta, Amy Sands & Jonathan B. Tucker  -- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists  -- May 01, 2002

The authors suggest that to control the threat of bioterrorism, the Bush administration should strengthen domestic regulations to control and secure deadly pathogens and toxins and by launching the negotiation of a new ?biosecurity convention? to control these substances internationally.

Explore Related:


Defusing Nuclear Terror -- Jeffrey Richelson  -- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists  -- March 01, 2002

Jeffrey Richelson covers the organization and history of the Nuclear Emergency Search Teams (NEST), a covert group of specialists that form the U.S.'s frontline of defense against nuclear terrorism.

Explore Related:


What about the spent fuel? -- Robert Alvarez  -- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists  -- February 01, 2002

Until recently, concerns about attacks on commercial nuclear power plants focused mainly on the vulnerability of reactor containment buildings. But nuclear power plants may have a weaker link?spent fuel ponds. ?Reactors are inside steel vessels surrounded by heavy structures and containment buildings,? says Gordon Thompson, senior scientist at the Institute for Resource and Security Studies. ?Spent fuel pools, containing some of the largest concentrations of radioactivity on the planet, can catch fire and are in much more vulnerable buildings.?

Explore Related:


Wrong Plan - A Proposal for Boost-Phase Missile Defense -- Richard L. Garwin  -- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists  -- March 01, 2000

Richard L. Garwin critiques the administration's missile defense proposal and offers a remarkable alternative that would be less suspectible to common countermeasures, more accurate than the current system, and less likely to violate existing treaties and anger Russia and China.

Explore Related: